Intestinal Worms More Condition_symptoms

In public school you will learn more in Italy because of low private

The detailed reading of the data released a few days ago shows that without equal in our country to climb the three classifications (Reading, Math and Science) to ten positions of

EXCEPT Intravaia

La scuola pubblica italiana sta meglio di quello che sembra, basta leggere correttamente i dati. Sono le private la vera zavorra del sistema. Almeno stando agli ultimi dati dell'indagine Ocse-Pisa ¹ sulle competenze in Lettura, Matematica e Scienze dei quindicenni di mezzo mondo. Insomma: a fare precipitare gli studenti italiani in fondo alle classifiche internazionali sono proprio gli istituti non statali. Senza il loro "contributo", la scuola italiana scalerebbe le tre classifiche Ocse anche di dieci posizioni. La notizia arriva nel bel mezzo del dibattito sui tagli all'istruzione pubblica e sui finanziamenti alle paritarie, mantenuti anche dall'ultima legge di stabilità, che hanno fatto esplodere la protesta studentesca.

"Nonostante i 44 miliardi spesi ogni anno per la scuola statale i risultati sono scadenti. Meglio quindi tagliare ed eliminare gli sprechi", è stato il leitmotiv del governo sull'istruzione negli ultimi due anni. E giù con 133 mila posti e otto miliardi di tagli in tre anni. Mentre alle paritarie i finanziamenti statali sono rimasti intonsi. Ed è proprio questo il punto: le scuole private italiane che ricevono copiosi finanziamenti da parte dello Stato fanno registrare performance addirittura da terzo mondo. I dati Ocse non lasciano spazio a dubbi. Numeri che calano come una mazzata sulle richieste avanzate in recent months by groups of non-state schools and a certain political party. The latter claim

the possibility of a truly equal choice between public and private sectors in the beautiful country. In other words, equal to more money.

A month ago, during the presentation of the twelfth report on Catholic schools, the Italian Bishops' Conference has said very clearly that in Italy there is no "culture of equality understood as the ability to offer the family a real choice between different schools ideal setting. " The Secretary-General of the CEI, Monsignor Mariano Crusade, has also noted, from an economic perspective, "the presence of private schools face save the Italian state each year, five and a half billion euro, compared with a contribution of the public a little over 500 million euro "and points out that in Europe the freedom of education is substantially the effective rule." Yes, but with what result?

The framework of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development through the PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) is merciless. The average score achieved by the Italian olds in public schools in reading and comprehension written texts is equal to the OECD average: 489 points, which placed the Italian school in 23rd place. With private schools dropped to 30 th place. Much the same for Mathematics and Science, where the gap with the OECD average is only 5 points: 492 for the Italian state, which we would climb to 25th place, and 497 for the OECD countries. By combining the data with those of students who sit among the private banks are forced to settle in a far less flattering Sciences 35th place.

But there's more: the Italian school, ranking compared to 2006, gets 20 points in Reading, 16 and even 24 in Science in Mathematics. The private, despite the funding, rather than collapse. The OECD, among private institutions, should identify those who "receive less than 50 per cent of their core funding (those who support services, basic educational institution) from government agencies and those receiving more than 50 percent. And it is the fifteen of those establishments that are embarrassing performance record: 403 points in reading, compared to an OECD average of 493 points, which places them among their peers and the Tunisian Republic of Montenegro.